<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Islamic News &#124; Muslim Photos of the world &#124; Islamic Wallpapers ... &#187; Home Page</title>
	<atom:link href="/Islam/home-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://islamicblog.co.in</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:50:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VHP demands land for Ram temple construction in Ayodhya</title>
		<link>https://islamicblog.co.in/2011/01/vhp-demands-land-for-ram-temple-construction-in-ayodhya/</link>
		<comments>https://islamicblog.co.in/2011/01/vhp-demands-land-for-ram-temple-construction-in-ayodhya/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 19:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://islamicblog.co.in/?p=6806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucknow, January 01: The Vishwa Hindu Parishad today said it would launch a fresh agitation if the entire 67 acres of land at the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site here is not alloted for the construction of the Ram temple. &#8220;We require the entire land for the grand temple that we want at the birthplace of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucknow, January 01: The Vishwa Hindu Parishad today said it would  launch a fresh agitation if the entire 67 acres of land at the Ram  Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site here is not alloted for the construction  of the Ram temple.</p>
<p>&#8220;We require the entire land for the grand temple that we want at the  birthplace of Lord Ram,&#8221; VHP president Ashok Singhal told newspersons  here, adding the work for carving of stones for the proposed temple  would begin in a month&#8217;s time.</p>
<p>&#8220;There would be no new agitation for the construction of Ram temple  as of now and the VHP would await for the apex court verdict on the  issue,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>The VHP president however warned that &#8220;in case the 67 acres of  acquired land by the Union government was not given for temple the  outfit would stage a massive agitation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Singhal said that according to estimates of architects, once  construction begins, they would be in a position to install idols in the  temple in one and a half year time. &#8220;The completion of the temple would  however take longer,&#8221; he said, adding &#8220;We have appealed to Ram bhakts  to donate for it and the work would be restarted soon.&#8221;</p>
<p>To a question, Singhal said there were shortcomings in the case filed  by Nirmohi Akhara, one of the main litigants in the Ayodhya dispute, in  High Court as it had only laid claim over the right to pray and serve  Ram Lala.</p>
<p>Singhal also criticised Jagatguru Shankaracharya Swami Swarupanandji  over his recent statement in media proposing construction of the temple  on lines of a Ram temple in Cambodia.</p>
<p>&#8220;When the model of the proposed temple was finalised it was in  consultation with saints and religious leaders and now Swarupanand&#8217;s  proposal of contructing it in any other style is unacceptable to us,&#8221;  Singhal said.</p>
<p>Swarupanandji has always criticised the VHP for its temple movement  and now we also sent a letter expressing our reservations over his  proposal, Singhal added.</p>
<p><em>PTI</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://islamicblog.co.in/2011/01/vhp-demands-land-for-ram-temple-construction-in-ayodhya/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
